1. “As you are proposing a date for outside the Human History” - your said claim is unjust, therefore, please define the Human History first in the Indian Context and then in the Universal Context as a whole or any other prevailing context; “Onus is on to you to prove that it was no Moon-Day” - Why the onus should be on to me to prove something which is absent in the Tai, Brah.. do you want me to rewrite the Tai.Brah. and produce it as a fact against the evidence I had provided in my paper ?. It appears that in the instant case, the facts on records are unknown to you or yet to be revealed to you, but your fantasy of being Expert resorted in illicit arguments, allegations and refutations of my articles is unjust, felonious. “It is reasonable to assume that all Bhrahmana texts are written in the same period”, - there is no such reasonable assumption unless it is supported with various inetrnal evidence so as to put them all in the same corpus and moreover, this is not the scientific way to evaluate human history with such generic sentences of your goodself made in a hay-say manner. 2. “It has been discussed in details” - I failed to read the details hidden between the lines, as there is no evidences made available and provided, till to this date, that all the Brahmanas’ were written at the same time/era. 3. “This is common sense. Brahmana texts are not going to be separated by over 7000 years” - thus, I refute it as being a very generic and inconsistent statement made by you for establishing your so-called imaginations. In fact, human history cannot be termed and should not be known through common sense but through historical facts and figures. In fact, Onus is upon you to provide the detailed evidence that all the Brahmanas’ can range between these 7000 years and are written during this period of time so claimed. I will be more than happy to take it as the evidence for the Brahmanas’, if you do so. Moreover, your contentions is doubtful and self-contradictory as in one place you stated that all the Brahmanas’ are written at the same time and on the other hand you give durations of 7000 years. 4. “Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidences – Carl Sagan“ – Yes, indeed I followed his legacy of Nataraja and had proved the Kali phenomena in Ardra Nakshatra. But I still fail to understand why I should create fake evidence of a "full moon" for the sake of your fantasy whereas there is no full moon evidence available in the Tai.Brah. If at all, there is any evidence available with you then please place on records. 5. Finally concluding on the way you wrote the refutation--Further, in short, the onus is upon you to provide the evidence for your so-called claims made with imaginary beliefs. The aggressive behaviour and foul language used while commenting on my post is with a sole intention to belittle me in the public eye and to malign with sinister will to prevail upon me without jurisdiction. Besides, it is also a fact that carelessly using foul language and making sarcastic comments on social media platforms, like Medium, is unlawful and uncalled-for resulting in felony.